Sunday, February 17, 2013

Listen, Listen, Listen ... to the Common People!

Update on the protest against the Singapore Population White Paper 2013.
Here's a second part of a write-up on the objections against the government's policy:

REFLECTIONS ON THE PROTEST AGAINST THE POPULATION WHITE PAPER: PART 2

20130218-002135.jpg
Photo credit: Julius Yang
This article is a continuation of Part 1 of the article which was published yesterday. In Part 1, I had discussed that we need to be clear that in our disagreement with the 6.9 population figure thrown up by the government that we need to be cognizant that the unhappiness that we face shouldn’t be directed at the foreigners and that if we reflect further, we would know that the inequalities that has been created by bad government policies was what had resulted in further segregation among the people, and thus the negative emotions which we had thus misplaced on the foreigners. It’s time to shift the focus back onto the government for their bad policies, and not misdirect it on foreigners, who have become the inadvertent scapegoat, on both sides.
In this article, I will delve deeper into the social and political landscape of Singapore to help us understand the dynamics and complexities that exist in our landscape and how it affects our psyche. I would finally like to remind Singaporeans that the current sea wave of change is part of a larger shift in the awakening among Singaporeans to the realities of Singapore, and how if we believe that change needs to happen, we must ride the wave of change and create the possibilities that we want to become reality. We must take back the rights that are ours, and create a Singapore that we believe in.
So, What Were Singaporeans Protesting About?
On Saturday, when more than 5,000 Singaporeans descended onto Hong Lim Park yesterday, what were they really protesting about? This, in fact, wasn’t just what the media was asking, but I believe, what many Singaporeans were thinking about. If you take a look on Facebook on some of the reasons why people had decided to go to the protest, there was a multitude of reasons – because they were unhappy with the government, because they didn’t think the government is listening or because they feel that the cost of living has become increasingly too high. There really wasn’t one common thread that ran through why Singaporeans had wanted to attend the ‘protest’ for. They might be attending this protest against the 6.9 million figure, but was it really this figure that had evoked their feelings for participation? And as I’ve discussed, it’s not.
But to the foreign media, they do not understand the complexities that are rooted in the psyche of Singaporeans. To the foreign media which had come down, they wanted to know – if you do not want 6.9 million people, then what are your solutions? What are your alternatives to growing an economy without 6.9 million people?
But to the people who didn’t adequately understand their feelings towards the 6.9 million, they were simply unhappy and they were gradually realising that it could perhaps be the government that they are unhappy about, and actually not the population, or the proportion of foreigners itself. And that’s why at the ‘protest’, the speakers spoke about how Singaporeans felt, and the feelings of how we no longer we that we are at home, where we feel that we do not have a stake in this country. We do not feel that we belong.
How Do You Understand The Unhappiness of Singaporeans?
To the foreign media, they might not understand how Singaporeans feel because – so, Singaporeans, you are telling me that for a country recently ranked 6th in terms of governance by the Economist, where you have the world’s highest per capita income and which is an envy of so many other countries, you are telling me that you are not happy? Seriously?
But, you see, not everything is measured in terms of money. Well, of course the foreign media would know this! Their own governments also pander to capitalistic interests. But their governments are not capitalists themselves – not to the extend that ours are. Their governments do not sideline the people so much so that the people are accorded as little social welfare as the government can afford, where the only so-called pension that the people have – the CPF – has also seen withdrawals decline since 2001 even as more people would need to withdraw from it.
On the surface, Singapore seems to have a perfect government where the government has fine-tuned a system that has worked so well for the people, and where the government continues to maintain a non-corrupt and secure environment. But when surveys by Gallup show that Singaporeans are the least happy people in the world and that we show the least positive emotions in the world, this is only the tip of the iceberg.
The Trappings of This PAP-Led Government
As much as government might have perfected the system, this perfection disappeared more than a decade ago. The golden years of policy-making by the PAP-led government has long pass and this current government has lost the art of balance in policy-making more than a decade ago. From 2001 onwards, their policy-making, or rather, policy-tweaking has become more firmly rooted in their profit-making motives, that it has resulted in an imbalance in the way they manage their policies, such that the policies are increasingly disadvantaging the people, and diverging away from the people’s needs.
And unfortunately, this government continues to believe that it knows what is right and what needs to be done for Singapore. This government continues to think that Singaporeans do not know what needs to be done and slights them as “noise” – this, even as the think tanks set up by them, such as the Institute of Policy Studies are also quoting articles which are contrary to what they have purported in the population white paper.
As I’ve mentioned before, the second fundamental problem with PAP is that they’ve also let power rule them. You can tell, by their behaviour and their resistance that this is a government which is increasingly scared that they will lose their power. Having very few ideas on how they can curb the participation of the opposition parties at the election and in parliament, they know that their control and time as government has become very precarious and because of that, they are starting to withdraw into their tortoise shell. PAP is now operating on a state of semi-shock where they are trying to continue to cruise on the firm institution built by Singapore’s founding leaders, but yet not knowing how to oil this institution anymore. They fear of losing their power and their denial of this happening and their resultant delusion, has caused them to unwittingly cripple themselves in their ability to govern.
What we now have in the PAP-led government is a very lethal combination of a government which has styled itself as a business and monopolized the competition in our economy and one which has allowed the almost-50 years of power to get into its head that at this time of mid-life crisis, it’s now suffering from pangs of anxiety and withdrawals, that has led it to become ineffective.
Making Ourselves Heard, Whether They Want To Or Not
Now, when Singaporeans were ‘protesting’ on Saturday, these were all that we were protesting about. But not all of us could articulate this. Not all of us know that this was what we want to articulate because some of us haven’t thought thoroughly about the issue at hand yet, or even if many of us have, we are still trying to come to terms with how this government might actually be using us to further their own means. We are also living in our own state of denial.
To the foreign media, as a reporter, you want clear outcomes. You want to come to a protest, know what the agenda clearly is, look out for a clear trend and await an outcome which you can write about. But today, when they came, they didn’t see that. They couldn’t see a clear message or a clear outcome. Most of the speakers spoke about how they felt and what their concerns were, which were very diverse. At the end, when asked if the government would take note of the protest or the petition that will be submitted, no one could give a definite answer because we know that the government will most probably slight us, once again, as “noise”. Then, what is the point of holding a ‘protest’? To the foreign media used to seeing protests in their countries and possibly seeing protests lead to affirmative action by their governments, what were these Singaporeans trying to get act with their protests? What were we hoping to achieve if not to pressure our government into changing at least the content of the white paper?
I’ve been asked many times as well why, in spite of the education that so many Singaporeans have received, that we allow our government to run us down with whatever they want to do. People talk about how Singaporeans are such pushovers because we allow our government to steamroll over us. Indeed, some speakers said at the ‘protest’ that they do feel defeated or are at their wits’ ends. To non-Singaporeans, it’s very hard to understand this because how can anyone with such a good education (qualified by the number of years of education) be so seemingly incapable? This is because you have to understand the education that we’ve been through, which as much as it produces students with good mathematics and science scores, are only as much a factory of robots, packaged to be unthinking and unquestioning, that are churned year after year for the Singapore factory.
Understandably, the foreign media might have expected much more – for the people to push the government into action. Give us 3 years. When we put a new government in place, we will make sure that this government works for us. We will make sure that this government listens to us and do what we want. We will make sure that this government makes decisions that will be for the good of all, and even businesses. We will make sure that this government reprioritises itself and not allow themselves to become so bogged down by their profit-making needs that they sacrifice both the interests of businesses and the people to protect their own power and wealth.
But This Is Not A Protest, It’s An Awakening
The truth is that the ‘protest’ on Saturday isn’t really a protest. The ‘protest’ today is only part of larger awakening that Singaporeans are undergoing. It’s part of a realization of our rights as people, learning what is truly wrong with our government and trying to find new ways of thinking, working and developing solutions for ourselves and for our country. Today is only part of a larger awakening that has been ongoing since prior to the general election in 2011, and which intensified from the SMRT bus drivers incident, the Aim-AHTC saga, the by-election, the release of the white paper, finally the protest now, then later, Budget 2013 and then back to the Aim-AHTC saga, with the review of the town councils and possibly a report on Our National Conversation. Today, we might have organized a protest. But, for many of us, this is an awakening. The protest should really have been called an awakening, a realization – a realization that there are many other Singaporeans who feel the same as I do, that I am not the other one, that the unfairness I feel that I’ve been feeling is common among my fellow Singaporeans and slowly but surely, we are all realising that we are suffering from our unfair treatment under a government which has lost its bearings and is using us for its own wanton wants. And today, we will continue to be spurred to find out more and to push them to admit the truth, and to push them out of power, because we need to protect ourselves and our future generations.
In the last few months, the raising of our awareness has been fast-tracked. This is not a matter of whether we are want to be awakened. We will be awakened even if we are not ready to, because at the pace things are changing, we can only expect to be carried with the winds of change. Even the heavens are playing their part by not allowing us to let up in our learning, where we are left catching our breath, with each new incident – straight after the by-election, we have the release of the white paper and immediately after that, the protest. We are now given an excellent opportunity to understand the workings of Singapore. Each new incident has uncovered new understands of how this government operates and the inherent flaws. The more we know, the more we will be able to take them on at the next general election and the more we will be able to form a government, that together with the rest of Singaporeans, will be able to run on the ideals and principles that we truly believe in. When we put the next government in power, we will make sure that we will also be the ones to govern together with them. Governance is not the sole propriety of an elected group of people. If we want our rights to be respected, then we need to learn to exercise our rights and learn to govern ourselves.
http://thehearttruths.com/2013/02/18/reflections-on-the-protest-against-the-population-white-paper-part-2/
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~


The ST reported a 'large turnout' of more than 1,000 while yahoo news defined a 'huge turnout' at more than 4,000. Whatever it is, the Singaporean working class, whose worst fears are losing their jobs to foreign workers, suppressed wages, rising cost of living and housing braved the drizzle to protest the government's policy on hiring and giving citizenships to aliens.
Compared to the street savvy Malaysian demonstrators, the Singaporean crowd appeared tame with their umbrellas and hand-written placards and posters. They looked like regular Chinese, Malay and Indian families with Mums, Dads, kids and Gramps out for a picnic at the Padang. Only this Saturday afternoon, they weren't sitting around a picnic spread. While their feet sank into the muddy ground, they lent their ears from 4-8pm to 12 speakers, namely former NTUC chief Tan Kin Lian, former presidential candidate Tan Jee Say, SDP's Vincent Wijeysingha and NSP's Jeanette Chong-Aruldoss. The speakers who were given 10 minutes each to address the crowd slammed at the 6.9 million population target stated in the White Paper.         
The protest was organised by transitioning.org, a support site for unemployed.
Links:
http://www.straitstimes.com/breaking-news/singapore/story/large-turnout-speakers-corner-protest-against-population-white-paper-2
http://sg.news.yahoo.com/huge-turnout-at-speakers--corner-for-population-white-paper-protest-101051153.html

Thursday, February 14, 2013

Heil, Hitler!


A young Singaporean felt the heat from the 'overpopulation' policy.

It's all about the economy, stupid!

I wonder what ever happened to 'Singapore for Singaporeans'?
Wasn't that the slogan championed by LKY in the '60s when he argued against Ja'afar Albar's 'Ultra' struggle for Malay special rights?
Now, my heart goes out to the Singaporeans, not just the Malays but also Chinese and Indians who are feeling smothered by the huge influx of FTs (foreign talents). And MORE to come with the republic's 6.9 million population target by 2030.
Here's one instance where some Singaporeans could no longer repress their feelings of being 'boxed' in:


Public · By Gilbert Goh
What do we know? The meek Singaporeans are finally feeling the heat and beginning to voice their objections openly.
Well, when my niece visited me a couple of years ago, she had complained about the overwhelming presence of FTs at her workplace, the HDB flat, the buses, the MRT, the shopping malls, practically everywhere. At a personal level, she feared her job would be given to a Pinoy with a college degree but can't do the work that she, with an O level, can easily accomplish. I doubt if she can cite racial discrimination (not because some smart alec Malaysian editor had pooh-poohed race as a myth) but because Pinoys are actually Malays, only most of them are Christians.
And she's not alone. Even Fandi Ahmad, the Football Star and former Lions Captain, was sidelined in favour of a coach with an Eastern European name.
http://andrewlohhp.wordpress.com/2013/02/12/fandi-and-the-singaporean-core/

http://www.tnp.sg/content/fandi-ive-stopped-hoping-be-lions-coach

However, before Malaysian bloggers scream 'ethnic cleansing', here's PM Lee Jr's take: 

Malay share of population will not shrink: PM Lee
Prime Minister Lee speaking in Parliament on Friday. The ratio of Malays in Singapore will not change in the future even as the population grows, said Prime Minister Lee Hsien Loong in Parliament on Friday. -- PHOTO: TV SCREENGRAB.
http://www.straitstimes.com/breaking-news/singapore/story/malay-share-population-will-not-shrink-pm-lee-20130208     

Somehow, that failed to assure a Singapore Malay MP and a Malaysian pro-UMNO blog:

http://www.straitstimes.com/breaking-news/singapore/story/mp-asks-how-position-malays-saf-compares-those-new-citizens-20130206

http://theunspinners.blogspot.com/2013/02/pap-admit-not-giving-malay-equal.html









File photo of Singapore Armed Forces (SAF) Day parade, held on July 1, 2012 at the Safti Military Institute. PAP MP Zaqy Mohamad (Chua Chu Kang GRC) today asked for the Government's assurance that the status and role of Malay men in the Singapore Armed Forces (SAF) would continue to improve as the population expands with newcomers. -- ST PHOTO:  ALPHONSUS CHERN
PAP MP Zaqy Mohamad (Chua Chu Kang GRC) today asked for the Government's assurance that the status and role of Malay men in the Singapore Armed Forces (SAF) would continue to improve as the population expands with newcomers.
He was the latest Malay MP of several this week to touch on how the Malay-Muslim community will be affected as the population heads towards a projected 6.9 million in 2030.
They have expressed concern during the Parliamentary debate on the Population White Paper that a disproportionately small number of immigrants are Muslim or from Malaysia and Indonesia.
Mr Zaqy noted that the Ministry of Defence has stated in the past that it is evolving its policy on Malays in top positions in the SAF and "is in sync and aware of where the community wants to head."
But with four out of ten marriages already between Singaporeans and foreigners, Mr Zaqy wanted to know "what will be the position of our Malay sons of Singapore next to those of families with foreign spouses and new citizens?"
When the sons from local-foreign marriages reach the age to enter National Service, he said that he hoped that "our national security narrative pertaining to the Malays serving in the defence sector would have also evolved, and that all sons of Singapore get equal footing in all opportunities, including that in our national security services."

Saturday, February 2, 2013

Caliphate vs Nation States


The 1916-1918 Arab Revolt was often carried out by mounted Arab tribesmen, who knew the land intimately and were excellent marksmen (Library of Congress).
Arab Kabilahs (clansmen) ready to charge at their Turkish opponents in the 1916-1918 Arab Revolt 
(Library of Congress).
http://www.historynet.com/creating-chaos-lawrence-of-arabia-and-the-1916-arab-revolt.htm
Whenever I hear or read laments about the fall of the Ottoman Empire, which marked the end of the Islamic Caliphate rule, my mind begin to wonder if indeed the rise of Arab nationalism had been at the expense of Islamic glory? 
If one were to read further on modern history of the Middle East, the Allied Forces (Great Britain and France) did play a dominant role in the World War I Arab uprising against the Turks. This Revolt not only led to the collapse of Turkish stranglehold over the Middle East but the defeat of the Turkish armed forces in Europe. New Arab nation-states and the Balkans were created in its wake, in the 1920s. It also paved the way for the formation of the state of Israel. Liberation from the 'Sick Old Man of Europe', however, failed to guarantee peace, popular rule, political stability, moderate Islam, and Arab-Israeli accord over Palestine. Instead, the region had been plagued with "wars, authoritarian governments, coups, the rise of militant Islam, and the enduring conflict between Israelis and Palestinians.
As with great sweeping changes in the historical landscape, the people caught in the turmoil were the least able to forecast the future. I wonder if ardent supporters of Arab nationalism like my late father, who was born in late 1917,at the height of the 1916-1918 Arab Revolt, were able to foresee what was in store for the Arab World.  
to be continued ...
Next instalement - Kaum Tua vs Kaum Muda
(The Old Clerics vs the Young Turks)
Picture courtesy of: http://mahir-al-hujjah.blogspot.com/2009/12/1_2714.html

Divided Land



As-salam, fortunately I stumbled upon this FB post by Singaporean playwright, Alfian Sa'at, yesterday. The natural reaction would be to imagine "what could have been, what might been" had Tunku not kicked Singapore out of Malaysia in 1965.
Incidentally too, the conversation at the end of today's afternoon soiree was about "what might have been" if Malaya had achieved Independence at the same time as Indonesia in 1945. If Mustapha Hussain had secured ONE more vote to be UMNO's President and Malaya's first Prime Minister.
Now, 'unity' seems to be the last thing on some politicians' agenda. What with the wide divide among the Malay political parties and the call for Sabah and Sarawak to be out of Malaysia. Sigh.  
Alfian Sa'at A song commissioned by the Singapore Ministry of Culture to commemorate Singapore's merger into the Federation of Malaysia.
'Divided Land'
Performed by Julie Sudiro and Ahmad Daud
There is a land divided by the sea

Waiting for unity
There is a land in our hearts so dear
That's our land of Malaysia
There is a land divided by history

Longing for unity
There is a land full of prosperity
That's Malaysia our new country
Let's build a bridge and span the sea

To join Malaysia
Let's work for life so full of harmony
In our future Malaysia
There is a land divided by the sea

Waiting for unity
There is a land in our hearts so dear
That's our land of Malaysia
There is a land divided by history

Longing for unity
There is a land full of prosperity
That's Malaysia our new country
Let's build a bridge and span the sea

To join Malaysia
Let's work for life so full of harmony
In our future Malaysia
Let's work for life so full of harmony
In our future Malaysia.
Yesterday at 3:22am · Like

Friday, January 18, 2013

Walking Down the Memory Mine Field



I'd never thought that writing a childhood memoir would be like walking down a memory mine field. One wrong word and you'd cause a long dormant emotion to flare up. 
Which brings us to the reason why people write memoirs.
To seek the truth. To set the record straight. To be fair to our own memories in spite of how others choose to define us.
However, dislodging an entrenched image is an arduous task. 
The Brat. The Enfant Terrible. The Rebel. The Hippie. The Prodigal Child. The Belligerent Sibling. The Miserable Single.
Types created by those, who by virtue of their birth order or ranking, felt that they have the absolute right to perpetuate the family myth.  Since in most family hierarchy or pecking order, someone's got to be The Scapegoat, The Whipping Boy, or Girl. To fulfil others' cravings for an externalised Object of Ridicule or Contempt. Or projections of their own Guilt.
And that someone is expected to be a sport to laugh along at put-downs thinly veiled as jokes or harmless recollections of the past. She must never, ever lose her temper, regardless of how she's provoked. Perhaps the best approach is to view those instances as opportunities to practise graciousness or to develop a profound understanding of human complexities. Lest she be accused of being The Ingrate.

An interesting read:

Defining Your Authentic Self

Are you living a life that is more in tune with your "authentic" self (who you were created to be) or your "fictional" self (who the world has told you to be)? 
You probably weren't even aware that these versions of your "self" existed! Dr. Phil explains the difference between the authentic and fictional self: 

http://stage.drphil.com/articles/article/73

Thursday, January 10, 2013

The Badaruddin Family Tree

           After a few days of surfing for free templates, I've finally constructed a basic family tree chart on my own.  All thanks to Geni!
           Now, I'd have to look for a 'bodhi' tree (tree of life) or 'pohon beringin' instead of an oak tree for the backdrop. And of course, pictures of the family members, which will be a challenge to acquire! Well, at least I've got started. It's just a matter of building on it.  Try it yourself - it may be tedious but fulfilling.
A very basic chart to build upon
Family Genealogy
First tier:
Paternal grandparents: Haji Yusoff Shahabuddin m Hajjah Aminah.  
Maternal grandparents -- Ahmad Semawi m Karsinah aka Chemplok
Second tier:
Father & Siblings (Aunts & Uncles/Hala & Halathi) -
Haji Yusoff Shahabuddin (Siddi) m Hajjah Aminah = Azizah, Badaruddin aka Aji Din, Haniffah, Ishak, Hasnah.
Mother & Siblings (Aunts & Uncles/Wak) - 
Tok Mat Semawi + Nek Chemplok = Hassan, Zainah, Rahman, Rahim, Rabiah, Said. 
Third tier:
Paternal Cousins -
1.  Hajjah Azizah m Haji Kassim = Mahfudzah
2.  Aji Din m Rabiah = Hatta, Hanum, Kamal, Hayati & Baiti
3.  Hajjah Haniffah m ? = Abdullah, Khairiah & Fakhriah
4.  Haji Muhammad m ?  = Fatahiah
5.  Haji Ishak m Hajjah Rodhiah = Naimah, Hassan & Lukman
6.  Hajjah Hasnah m Syed = Syed Abdul Rahman.
Maternal Cousins -
1.  Hassan (Wak Asan) m Kalsom (Wak Som) = Rashid (Abang Sed), Latiff (Abang Tep), Aziz (Abang Ajis), Azizah, Kamariah, Razak, Wahab, Wahid, Manan and Karim (Dadeh).  
2.  Zainah (Wak Enah) m Sirat (Wak Sirat) = Abang Osman, Abang Ali, Manisah (Kak Bulat), Kak Jamilah, Abang Omar, Kak Halimah and Maimon.  
3.  Sa'adiah (Wak Yok) m Mohd Said (Wak Said) = Abang Ja'afar, Rahmat (Abang Imat), Rahimah (Kak Imah), Abang Sani, Rafeah (Kak Pat), Jamilah (Kak Milah), Jamil, Tutut and Ratna (Tenah).  
3.  Rahman (Wak Amang) m Maimunah (Mak Munah) = Habibah (Kak Bibah), Hamzah (Abang Amzah), Halimah (Kak Alimah), Hanafi (Anapi, died in an accident when he was pre-adolescent), Halim (Alim) and Hashim (Achim).  
4.  Rahim (Wak Aeng) m Zaharah (Wak Jarah) = ????  
5.  Rabiah m Badarudin = Hatta, Hanum, Kamal, Hayati, Baiti.  
6.  Said (Pak Cik Pom) m Mariam = ?